Fitzroy Legal Service submits policy and law reform
submissions as part of its efforts to represent the concerns of its clients and
to promote social justice for the wider community. FLS submissions are available
to the public and can be accessed by clicking on the links below.
2010
Bail Review
In 2007, the Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC) found
that bail laws did not apply equally to all people. The VLRC report recommended a rewriting of
the Bail Act 1977. This would simplify the language of the Act
and define the powers of police, bail justices and courts in relation to
granting bail and any bail conditions.
The report also called for training of bail justices about the special
needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable people.
FLS wrote the Department of Justice in support of most
recommendations made by the VLRC report but remained opposed to the system of
bail justices in Victoria.
In 2010 the Department of Justice began reviewing the
Victims of Crime Compensation scheme, including sentencing orders and
compensation awards. FLS made a
submission to the review.
FLS made a number of recommendations including, Magistrates
should have specialised training to hear Victims of Crimes Assistance Tribunal
(VoCAT) matters; and, legal fees for VoCAT matters be raised to increase the
number of available lawyers. FLS also
recommended extending the availability of financial compensation to victims of
sexual violence prior to 1997.
Briefing Paper -
Severe Substance Dependence Treatment Bill
In 2009 FLS collaborated with other community legal centres
to make a submission to the Victorian parliament about the Severe Substance Dependence Treatment Bill.
FLS argues this Bill extends the power of involuntary
detention of those people with drug and alcohol dependence. FLS argued for more
definition of the mechanisms which give rise to the Magistrates' Court's power
to order detention. FLS also raised
concerns about whether the Bill safeguards basic human rights.
In 2009, FLS made a submission
to a Parliamentary Inquiry investigating the trafficking of people for sex work
in Victoria.
FLS points out that most
victims of sex trafficking are reluctant to report their experience to
Police. FLS believes this may preclude
victims from eligibility for financial compensation. We argue that the victims' compensation
tribunal (VoCAT) should be able to accept reports from specialised agencies
dealing with sexual violence or trafficking as evidence that trafficking
occurred.
The report of the Inquiry's
findings is expected June 2010.
'Spent convictions' are schemes which erase certain
convictions on an individual's criminal record after a specified time period
has lapsed. The laws around spent
convictions are state-specific and can be a significant barrier to
employment. Victoria lags behind the other states in this area. In 2008, the Federal Government proposed a
Bill to create a uniform scheme for spent convictions across all states.
In 2009 FLS made a submission
arguing the proposed uniform scheme needed to go further. FLS argued the Bill needed to strongly state
the amount and relevance of information released to prospective employers
requesting the check. FLS also called
for clarity as to how the uniform scheme would interact with existing schemes
in the states.
FLS wrote to the City of Yarra in September 2009
opposing the proposed law to ban the consumption of alcohol in the streets of
Yarra. FLS argued the proposed law gave
an anti-poverty, not anti-alcohol message.
For example, homeless residents of Yarra who consumed alcohol would be
in breach of the proposed law because of their social disadvantage. Further, harm minimization or crime
prevention research did not evidence that the proposed law would improve social
outcomes.
Ultimately, the City of Yarra
passed the law with effect from 1 December 2009, banning the public consumption
of alcohol at all times.
In 2009, the Victorian Law
Reform Commission (VLRC) began an inquiry into surveillance in public places
with a view to improving the relevant laws.
FLS argued that surveillance technology has significant limitations as a
tool to enhance safety within the community.
FLS supported the development of laws to regulate surveillance practices
which were weighed against human rights such as the right to use public
space.
The VLRC has not yet published
its final report into this project.
Public offences and increased powers to the Police
The Victorian Government proposed to introduce the Summary
Offences and Control of Weapons Acts Amendment Bill 2009. The amendments will give
police increased powers to intervene and diffuse situations that may interfere
with the peaceful enjoyment of public places. The introduction of these amendments
was linked to increased public space offences in the central business district
and other entertainment precincts.
FLS argues that
the terms of the powers and offences proposed are too broad and give the police
discretionary powers that can be applied arbitrarily. FLS argues this may encourage discriminatory
profiling, unjustly impact upon people who are vulnerable and increase the
chances of punitive interference by the police.
FLS concludes
the Bill offends Human Rights Charter, and will negatively impact upon the well-being
and tolerance in the community.
In 2008, FLS made a submission
about the proposed changes to the Equal
Opportunity Act 1995 (the Act) to the Victorian Equal Opportunity
Commission. FLS argued that the Act did
not adequately equip the Commission to prevent discrimination across the whole
of society or against individuals. FLS
was supportive of the expansion of the Commission's powers to initiate actions
even where there had been no complaint.
FLS suggested that the conciliation function of the Commission would be
better positioned with a third specialist dispute resolution agency.
The amended legislation is
currently being debated in the Victorian Parliament.
Vexatious litigants are people
identified by the courts as repeatedly bringing matters without merit to court
and they are then 'barred' from bringing further matters to Court. In 2008, the Victorian Parliament began an
inquiry to improve the way Victorian courts were dealing with vexatious
litigants. FLS made a submission which
argued that the reforms should be broadly focused on improving access for
individuals to representation in court, rather than narrowly focused on
vexatious litigants.
In 2007 the Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC) began a
review of the laws which made abortions a criminal offence in Victoria. FLS made a submission recommending
that abortion should no longer be a criminal offence. FLS argued that all people should be able to equally
access health care and this was only achieved where women and their doctors
could legally access and perform abortions.
Ultimately, the VLRC recommendation to decriminalise
abortion was accepted by the Victorian parliament which legislated for the
necessary changes to the Crimes Act 1958
in 2008.
In 2007, FLS wrote to the Sentencing Advisory Council (SAC) about
suspended sentences. Suspended sentences
involve an offender being sentenced to prison but by not committing another
offence during the term of the 'sentence', they do not have to serve a time in
prison. Sometimes suspended sentences
have other conditions attached, such as a community based treatment orders.
In 2008 the SAC recommended that suspended sentences should
continue to be available but needed reform, especially in relation to suspended
sentences with conditions.
FLS agreed with the continued availability of suspended
sentences and most other recommendations of Part II of the report. FLS queried whether allowing 'special
conditions' to be imposed on Intensive Correction Orders would be in breach of
Victoria's Charter of Human Rights.